Event
Cultural dissent in Central and Eastern Europe
The spring online lecture series of the Forum in Literary Studies at the Institute of Czech Literature of the CAS will offer insight into current research topics of cultural dissent before 1989 in Central and Eastern Europe, especially issues of gender, alternative culture, mediality, transnationality and leftist thinking.
9. 2. Jan Matonoha (Institute of Czech Literature of the CAS): Dispozitivy mlčení: zraňující přilnutí a diskursivní ustavování mlčení. Gender a česká literatura disentu a samizdatu (in Czech)
9. 3.Cold War Print Cultures I: Piotr Wciślik in conversation with Jessie Labov about samizdat social media (in English)
13. 4.Cold War Print Cultures II: Jessie Labov in conversation with Piotr Wciślik about Transatlantic Central Europe (in English)
Jessie Labov (Central European University)
Piotr Wciślik (Centrum Humanistyki Cyfrowej IBL PAN)
11. 5. Kristina Andělová (Institute of Contemporary History of the CAS): „Di do hajzlu, ty sajrajte!“ Spor o kulturu v českém disentu (in Czech)
We broadcast the lectures live on the ICL YouTube channel, where the recordings are also available: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCE2SFhelIAxSuj4lcUi9PyQ.
You can discuss on the Google Meet platform.
Prior registration is not required.
The lectures start at 5 pm.
The lecture series is organized in the context of the European COST Action 16213 New Exploratory Phase in Research on East European Cultures of Dissent and in the context of the national project INTER-COST LTC18040 Media of Cultural Opposition in Czechoslovakia, supported from the INTER-EXCELLENCE programme of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.
The popularization team of the ICL participates in the organization and promotion of the event within the project Development of Research and Popularisation Resources of the Institute of Czech Literature of the Czech Academy of Sciences CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/18_054/0014701, co-financed by the European Union.
Information
Related to the event
See also
GENESIS – CRACOW 2019. Genetic Criticism: from Theory to Practice
Faculty of Polish Studies at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow and Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) in Paris are pleased to invite you to participate in the international conference GENESIS – CRACOW 2019. GENESIS – CRACOW 2019 will be the second edition of a new series of conferences on genetic criticism, understood as the study of the creative process. The first edition, held on 7-9 June 2017 in Helsinki (Finland), was organized by the Finnish Literature Society and Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes in Paris. The participants included scholars from Finland, France, Austria, Belgium, England, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Tunisia, Turkey, Wales and Canada.
Marxist Literary Research in Polish Peoples Republic and Czechoslovak Republic and their contexts. 1944-1956
Ośrodek Studiów Kulturowych i Literackich nad Komunizmem zaprasza na dwudniowe warsztaty polsko-czeskie poświęcone marksizmowi w badaniach literackich w latach 1945-1955 w Polsce i Czechosłowacji: "Marxist Literary Research in Polish Peoples Republic and Czechoslovak Republic and their contexts. 1944-1956". Warsztaty odbędą się w Pałacu Staszica, Nowy Świat 72 w sali 144, w dniach 22-23 listopada. Wstęp wolny. Język obrad: angielski.
East European Dissent between Agenda & Legacy
This conference shall analyze the making of the legacy of East European dissent on the local, national and European levels. Interested primarily in the cultural and political aspects of this process, this conference aims to explore the following questions in particular: how have cultural products related to dissent and repression been employed to depict social relations and legitimize political regimes before and after 1989? How have political-ideological, ethnic or gender-related factors impacted what has been included in and excluded from the legacy of dissent? How have the biographies, agendas and roles of ‘post-dissidents’ shaped and been shaped by processes of remembrance and canonization in the decades since 1989? Conversely, how has ‘1989’ and the process of transition been viewed from the perspective of individuals and groups who did not associate any major expectations or fears with them? Last but not least, what is the relevance of communist-era dissent for Europe today?
Allen Kuharski, Richard Lowe: The Digital Archiving of Performance Data: The Case of Witold Gombrowicz / Otwarte zebranie Centrum Humanistyki Cyfrowej IBL PAN